Zipzet, Inc. agreed to build Marla a storage building for $8,000. After beginning the project, Zipzet realized that it could not complete the job and make a profit. Zipzet demanded $9,500 to complete the building. Marla agreed to pay the $9,500. When the project was complete, Marla tendered $8,000 to Zipzet for the job. If Zipzet sues Marla for the remaining $1,500:
a. Zipzet will lose because there was no legal consideration to support the additional $1,500.
b. Zipzet will win because Marla had a pre-existing duty to pay any additional amounts.
c. Zipzet will lose because the UCC does not require consideration to modify an existing contract.
d. Zipzet will win because there was consideration for the additional $1,500.
Answer: A
If the answers is incorrect or not given, you can answer the above question in the comment box. If the answers is incorrect or not given, you can answer the above question in the comment box.