Angelo drove through an intersection without looking and hit Hal's car that he had driven into the intersection without obeying a stop sign. Angelo sued Hal. The jury found that Angelo's fault contributed 20 percent to the collision and determined that his total loss was $100,000. Under comparative negligence, the jury should award Angelo:

Angelo drove through an intersection without looking and hit Hal's car that he had driven into the intersection without obeying a stop sign. Angelo sued Hal. The jury found that Angelo's fault contributed 20 percent to the collision and determined that his total loss was $100,000. Under comparative negligence, the jury should award Angelo:

Angelo drove through an intersection without looking and hit Hal's car that he had driven into the intersection without obeying a stop sign. Angelo sued Hal. The jury found that Angelo's fault contributed 20 percent to the collision and determined that his total loss was $100,000. Under comparative negligence, the jury should award Angelo:



a. $20,000.
b. $100,000.
c. nothing.
d. $80,000.






Answer: D


Learn More :

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)