Brent works as a bartender at The Little Nipper, a local bar. Under state law, bartenders are required to be licensed. The licensing requires filling out an application and submitting a $50 application fee. The application does not require any special education or experience, just the $50 fee. Cal enters Brent's bar, orders a round of drinks for the house, then notices that Brent's license is not on display behind the bar. Cal learns that Brent is not licensed and refuses to pay for the round of drinks. The Little Nipper sues. What result?
a. Since Brent violated a regulatory statute, the contract is unenforceable.
b. Since this is a revenue-raising statute, the licensing law is unconstitutional. Cal wins.
c. Since this is a revenue-raising statute, The Little Nipper wins.
d. Since this is an illegal contract, the courts will not enforce it.
Answer: C
If the answers is incorrect or not given, you can answer the above question in the comment box. If the answers is incorrect or not given, you can answer the above question in the comment box.