Darius worked in an office. He had no criminal record, had never had a complaint made against him about his work or his conduct, and had been a faithful employee for nearly 20 years. One day, Darius followed his supervisor to his home and fatally shot him. The estate of the supervisor sued the company, claiming it should have been aware of Darius' growing frustration with work. The company's best defense will be:
a. that there was no way to foresee that the incident would happen.
b. that the killing was the result of a personal conflict between Darius and the supervisor.
c. that even if the company had been aware of Darius' difficulty with his supervisor, Darius did not have any criminal history.
d. that the incident occurred away from the office.
Answer: A
If the answers is incorrect or not given, you can answer the above question in the comment box. If the answers is incorrect or not given, you can answer the above question in the comment box.