In the case of Worldwide Insurance v. Klopp, the Supreme Court of Delaware found that:
a. the contract provision requiring arbitration was clear, unambiguous, and fair to both parties.
b. the automobile insurance policy was governed by UCC, Article 3.
c. the arbitration clause in Klopp's auto insurance contract was valid because it furthered the state policy favoring the use of arbitration to resolve disputes.
d. a contract provision requiring arbitration and then permitting appeal by either party was void as unconscionable.
Answer: D
If the answers is incorrect or not given, you can answer the above question in the comment box. If the answers is incorrect or not given, you can answer the above question in the comment box.